Logical Conceptualization

For purposes of communication within an area of knowledge (such as a science or business) we need an unambiguous vocabulary, a controlled vocabulary. The terms of a controlled vocabulary need to be articulated and related in a rigorous, explicit, consistent, formal way.  Other ways to describe this notion of a controlled vocabulary is a "jargon" or "specialized language" or "technical language".

A system is cohesive groups of interrelated, interdependent components that can be natural or human-made. A system has patterns.

A system can be explained by a logical theory.  A logical theory is an abstract conceptualization  of specific important details of some area of knowledge. The logical theory provides a way of thinking about an area of knowledge by means of deductive reasoning to derive logical consequences of the logical theory.

A logical theory enables a community of stakeholders trying to achieve a specific goal or objective or a range of goals/objectives to agree on important logical statements used for capturing meaning or representing a shared understanding of and knowledge in some area of knowledge.

A logical theory forms a logical conceptualization and is made up of a set of logical models, structures, terms, associations, rules, and facts. In very simple terms,

  • Logical conceptualization: A logical conceptualization is a set of models that are consistent with and permissible per that logical conceptualization.
  • Model: A model  is a set of structures that are consistent with and permissible interpretations of that model.
  • Structure: A structure is a set of logical statements which describe the structure.
  • Logical statement: A logical statement is a proposition, claim, assertion, belief, idea, or fact about or related to the area of knowledge to which the logical conceptualization relates.  There are five broad categories of logical statements: 
    • Terms: Terms are logical statements that define ideas used by the logical conceptualization such as “assets”, “liabilities”, “equity”, and “balance sheet”. A term is a defined "thing".  Each term tends to be a member of some class or set of things (terms) or type of thing.  Each term (thing) tends to be different from every other term (thing) in some way. A class or type of thing can have a subclass or subtype.
    • Associations: Associations are logical statements that describe permissible interrelationships between the terms such as “assets is part-of the balance sheet” or “operating expenses is a type-of expense” or “assets = liabilities + equity” or “an asset is a ‘debit’ and is ‘as of’ a specific point in time and is always a monetary numeric value”. Associations tend to be "is-a" (class-subclass, general-special, wider-narrower, type-subtype) or "has-a" (whole-part, has-part, part-of) or "has-role".
    • Rules: Rules are logical statements that describe what tend to be convertible into IF…THEN…ELSE types of relationships such as “IF the economic entity is a not-for-profit THEN net assets = assets - liabilities; ELSE assets = liabilities + equity”.
    • Facts: Facts are logical statements about the numbers and words that are provided by an economic entity within a financial report.  For example, the financial report might state “assets for the consolidated legal entity Microsoft as of June 20, 2017 was $241,086,000,000 expressed in US dollars and rounded to the nearest millions of dollars.
    • Properties: Properties are logical statements about the important qualities and traits of a model, structure, term, association, rule, and fact. A property is a type of an association, this thing has this property.

Fundamentally, a logical conceptualization is a set of logical statements.  Those logical statements can be represented in human-readable form or they could be expressed in machine-readable form.  Once in machine-readable form, those logical statements can be interrogated using software applications.  To the extent that this can be performed effectively; software tools can assist professional accountants, auditors, financial analysts, and others working with those logical statements.


More information:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Getting Started with Auditchain Luca (now called Luca Suite)

Image
(Note that a newer, production version as opposed to only the development version , of Luca Suite is available) The Innovator's Dilemma points out that disruptive innovations often look like toys that are doing everything wrong. Auditchain Luca , which is part of the Auditchain Suite , is a unique approach to creating a knowledge graph .  To experience using Auditchain Luca, have a look at the Getting Started with Auditchain Luca instructions. Be sure to grab the Excel and JSON import files used for this getting started exercise.   This getting started exercise uses one of several different approaches to getting information into a tool for constructing and viewing professional quality knowledge graphs .  Additional getting started guides will be made available over time. Auditchain Luca might not make sense to you if you don't understand the paradigm shift that is occurring and if you have not shifted your mental map. For the next step in your journey, consider trying creat
Read more

Relational Knowledge Graph System (RKGS)

Image
Relational Knowledge Graph System (RKGS) is an interesting idea that combines the relational paradigm and the knowledge graph paradigm.  This documentation, Why RKGS , explains the idea. This gets even more interesting with the notion of "relational AI".  RelationalAI is described as follows by the company of the same name, Relational.ai : “RelationalAI is a cloud-based relational knowledge graph management system, with state of the art probabilistic processing and declarative reasoning at scale to make developing Data Applications a superpower for your business.” This notion of knowledge graphs represented in relational databases fits into my belief that knowledge graphs have two aspects: the expression SYNTAX and the logic of what is expressed or SEMANTICS. While the LOGIC of a knowledge graph is always the same regardless of technical syntax used to express that logic; there are many, many different technical syntaxes that can be used to represent a knowledge graph. There
Read more

Professional System for Creating Financial Reports Leveraging Knowledge Graphs

Image
The document Professional System for Creating Financial Reports Leveraging Knowledge Graphs explains a new approach, a new paradigm, for creating financial reports.  The document provides a practical, nontechnical description of a professional system for creating provably high-quality financial reports where the report creator is using financial reporting schemes (such as US GAAP and IFRS) where report creator is permitted to modify the report model which leverages global standard knowledge graphs represented using XBRL. This new approach is useful, it is highly novel, and the details were highly complicated to pull together.  This is certainly not an incremental innovation.  It is definitely a disruptive innovation and it could very well be a foundational innovation. You can decide which for yourself. Foundational technologies have two dimensions that need to be considered: novelty and complexity. The more novel the technology is, the more effort needed to ensure users understand the
Read more