Evaluating the Quality of XBRL-based Financial Reports

From the time public companies started submitting XBRL-based financial reports to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, I have been looking at those reports, trying to understand the XBRL-based reports, and trying to figure out how to get them right.  That information was used to figure out how to create software applications that help professional accountants get these reports right.

Here is information that summarizes my testing and results which I stopped doing March 31, 2019:

Others are also finding errors.  Here are links to information that others are providing related to the quality of XBRL-based financial reports and other information I had laying around for assessing the quality of XBRL-based financial reports:

Professionals will study this information.  The quality of reports will improve as will the capabilities of software to detect errors.  Software used to create XBRL-based reports can use this information to help them help accountants using their software do a better job in creating machine readable reports.

For more information, check out the Seattle Method which is the approach I developed to avoid the types of mistakes that myself and others are pointing out. Also, check out Auditchain Luca, the world's first expert system, which is software being developed to create high quality XBRL-based financial reports.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Getting Started with Auditchain Luca (now called Luca Suite)

Relational Knowledge Graph System (RKGS)

Professional System for Creating Financial Reports Leveraging Knowledge Graphs