Regulatory Harmonization; Algorithmic Regulation

Regulation is information. For example, a public company submitting an XBRL-based report to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is an information exchange from the public company to the SEC.  The SEC then makes that information available to the public to make use of.

That information is a machine-readable digital signal published by the reporting public company.  That XBRL-based information sends a digital signal to the SEC and to those in the public markets that want to use that publicly available information. That digital signal sends a machine-readable message that can also be used to generate a human-readable signal (HTML, PDF).  

What message are you sending in your digital signal? A lot of public companies are making mistakes in their machine-readable digital signal.  For example, my personal measurements clearly show that the relations between high-level financial concepts in those messages have mistakes. I am able to extract information from those XBRL-based reports using a simple tool like Microsoft Excel and I am not even a very good programmer.  How does that reflect on the public company creating the report, software vendors providing tools to the public companies, and the auditors of those public companies?  What might investor relations departments of public companies think about this?

Many public companies that provide XBRL-based information to the SEC also provide XBRL-based information to some other regulator.  For example,

  • Depository institutions that submit XBRL-based information to the SEC also must submit XBRL-based information to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).
  • Energy companies that submit XBRL-based information to the SEC also must submit XBRL-based information to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC).
  • Insurance companies that submit XBRL-based information to the SEC also must submit information electronically (not XBRL currently) to the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC).
The SEC, FDIC, FERC, and NAIC each use different information formats. In addition, each of these public companies submits information to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).


There are a lot of different terms used to describe what I will refer to as "algorithmic regulation". This is an opportunity for governments to both save a ton of money and increase customer service to those that need to interact with the government.

Understandable knowledge representations and effective reasoning using those representations will change a lot of things. This will not be simply an incremental change; it will be a paradigm shift. Governments are already responding to this opportunity.  Australia says that they have saved billions.  In the United States, the Financial Data Transparency Act of 2022 is now law.

Make no mistake. Algorithmic regulation is coming.  Business professionals, including accountants, not only need to become literate in these techniques; they need to become fluent and even attain mastery.

Additional Information:


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Getting Started with Auditchain Luca (now called Luca Suite)

Image
(Note that a newer, production version as opposed to only the development version , of Luca Suite is available) The Innovator's Dilemma points out that disruptive innovations often look like toys that are doing everything wrong. Auditchain Luca , which is part of the Auditchain Suite , is a unique approach to creating a knowledge graph .  To experience using Auditchain Luca, have a look at the Getting Started with Auditchain Luca instructions. Be sure to grab the Excel and JSON import files used for this getting started exercise.   This getting started exercise uses one of several different approaches to getting information into a tool for constructing and viewing professional quality knowledge graphs .  Additional getting started guides will be made available over time. Auditchain Luca might not make sense to you if you don't understand the paradigm shift that is occurring and if you have not shifted your mental map. For the next step in your journey, consider t...
Read more

Relational Knowledge Graph System (RKGS)

Image
Relational Knowledge Graph System (RKGS) is an interesting idea that combines the relational paradigm and the knowledge graph paradigm.  This documentation, Why RKGS , explains the idea. This gets even more interesting with the notion of "relational AI".  RelationalAI is described as follows by the company of the same name, Relational.ai : “RelationalAI is a cloud-based relational knowledge graph management system, with state of the art probabilistic processing and declarative reasoning at scale to make developing Data Applications a superpower for your business.” This notion of knowledge graphs represented in relational databases fits into my belief that knowledge graphs have two aspects: the expression SYNTAX and the logic of what is expressed or SEMANTICS. While the LOGIC of a knowledge graph is always the same regardless of technical syntax used to express that logic; there are many, many different technical syntaxes that can be used to represent a knowledge graph. There...
Read more

Professional System for Creating Financial Reports Leveraging Knowledge Graphs

Image
The document Professional System for Creating Financial Reports Leveraging Knowledge Graphs explains a new approach, a new paradigm, for creating financial reports.  The document provides a practical, nontechnical description of a professional system for creating provably high-quality financial reports where the report creator is using financial reporting schemes (such as US GAAP and IFRS) where report creator is permitted to modify the report model which leverages global standard knowledge graphs represented using XBRL. This new approach is useful, it is highly novel, and the details were highly complicated to pull together.  This is certainly not an incremental innovation.  It is definitely a disruptive innovation and it could very well be a foundational innovation. You can decide which for yourself. Foundational technologies have two dimensions that need to be considered: novelty and complexity. The more novel the technology is, the more effort needed to ensure users ...
Read more