Regulatory Harmonization; Algorithmic Regulation

Regulation is information. For example, a public company submitting an XBRL-based report to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is an information exchange from the public company to the SEC.  The SEC then makes that information available to the public to make use of.

That information is a machine-readable digital signal published by the reporting public company.  That XBRL-based information sends a digital signal to the SEC and to those in the public markets that want to use that publicly available information. That digital signal sends a machine-readable message that can also be used to generate a human-readable signal (HTML, PDF).  

What message are you sending in your digital signal? A lot of public companies are making mistakes in their machine-readable digital signal.  For example, my personal measurements clearly show that the relations between high-level financial concepts in those messages have mistakes. I am able to extract information from those XBRL-based reports using a simple tool like Microsoft Excel and I am not even a very good programmer.  How does that reflect on the public company creating the report, software vendors providing tools to the public companies, and the auditors of those public companies?  What might investor relations departments of public companies think about this?

Many public companies that provide XBRL-based information to the SEC also provide XBRL-based information to some other regulator.  For example,

  • Depository institutions that submit XBRL-based information to the SEC also must submit XBRL-based information to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).
  • Energy companies that submit XBRL-based information to the SEC also must submit XBRL-based information to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC).
  • Insurance companies that submit XBRL-based information to the SEC also must submit information electronically (not XBRL currently) to the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC).
The SEC, FDIC, FERC, and NAIC each use different information formats. In addition, each of these public companies submits information to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).


There are a lot of different terms used to describe what I will refer to as "algorithmic regulation". This is an opportunity for governments to both save a ton of money and increase customer service to those that need to interact with the government.

Understandable knowledge representations and effective reasoning using those representations will change a lot of things. This will not be simply an incremental change; it will be a paradigm shift. Governments are already responding to this opportunity.  Australia says that they have saved billions.  In the United States, the Financial Data Transparency Act of 2022 is now law.

Make no mistake. Algorithmic regulation is coming.  Business professionals, including accountants, not only need to become literate in these techniques; they need to become fluent and even attain mastery.

Additional Information:


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Relational Knowledge Graph System (RKGS)

Image
Relational Knowledge Graph System (RKGS) is an interesting idea that combines the relational paradigm and the knowledge graph paradigm.  This documentation, Why RKGS , explains the idea. This gets even more interesting with the notion of "relational AI".  RelationalAI is described as follows by the company of the same name, Relational.ai : “RelationalAI is a cloud-based relational knowledge graph management system, with state of the art probabilistic processing and declarative reasoning at scale to make developing Data Applications a superpower for your business.” This notion of knowledge graphs represented in relational databases fits into my belief that knowledge graphs have two aspects: the expression SYNTAX and the logic of what is expressed or SEMANTICS. While the LOGIC of a knowledge graph is always the same regardless of technical syntax used to express that logic; there are many, many different technical syntaxes that can be used to represent a knowledge graph. There
Read more

Graph Hairball

Image
Knowledge graph system logic, the "things" and "relations between things" that  graph theory calls "vertices" (a.k.a. nodes, points, entities, things) and "edges" (a.k.a.  links, lines, relations, associations), looks like a big graph hairball as some people call it an example of which you can see here: Why?  This common view of a graph is because there has to be some "general view" of the information provided by the graph.  This is just like a general view of the information within a relational database is a table ; a set of ROWS and COLUMNS for exactly one table at a time. So what is interesting is that with a graph database the default view is everything in the graph of knowledge.  Whereas the default view of everything in a relational database is one table at a time. Further, it does not really matter whether the information that populates your knowledge graph comes from, say, CSV files, Excel, JSON, XBRL, RDF, PROLOG or whateve
Read more

PLATINUM Business Use Cases, Test Cases, Conformance Suite

Image
A brick wall is made of exactly two things: bricks, mortar. But a brick wall created by a master craftsman, or mason, and a brick wall created by a “weekend warrior” with no knowledge of masonry will be very different. Master craftsmen are created and that process takes time and effort. This blog post is a first prototype that brings several things together into one useful resource for business professionals.  It pulls together the human readable information of the Showcase of Reports   and the machine readable information of the Conformance Suite of XBRL-based Financial Reports Prepared using the Seattle Method .  Then, I want to incorporate the information found in these PLATINUM XBRL-based Financial Report Examples . The three resources can be useful and used independently; but they are even more useful when used together.  Business professionals really could not care a less about the technical details of getting some result that they want.  But technical professionals need to under
Read more