Models

We use a map to describe a territory.  The map is not the actual territory, but a map can be quite useful in navigating a territory. A model is similar to a map.

A model is not the real world thing, but if created adequately the model can serve the needs of the stakeholders of some system of interest.

A model enables a community of stakeholders trying to achieve a specific goal or objective or a range of goals/objectives to agree on important details related to capturing meaning or representing a shared understanding of and knowledge in some system of interest.

The model captures important information about the elements and relations of a system of interest.  The model provides information about the patterns within the system of interest.  Patterns are the orderly, regular behavior of the elements of the system of interest.

A model is intentional. A conceptual model has conceptual semantics. A model is expressed by some language but does not require the use of one specific language.

The description of the elements and patterns provided by a model can be deemed true to the extent that they are empirically tested and proven that the logic described by the model is consistent with the described model. The Atomic Design Methodology is an approach to thinking about models.

The more a model is tested empirically and proven to be useful to the stakeholders of the system of interest; the more confident we can be that the model accurately represents what is described by that model.  The more a model is shared with others and found to be useful by others in solving problems, the more objective the model becomes and the more indisputable the model becomes.

Coming up with an effective model is hard work.  It tends to be far quicker to learn a model from documentation of that model or from someone with skills and experience with that model than trying to create the model yourself.

When people hear the term "model" they sometimes think "toy".  In his book, “Models. Behaving. Badly.”, Emanual Derman explains the differences between metaphors, models, and theories.

  • A metaphor describes something less understandable by relating it to something more understandable.
  • A model is a specimen that exemplifies the ideal qualities of something. Models tend to simplify. There tend to always be gaps between models and reality. Models are analogies; they tend to describe one thing relative to something else. Models need a defense or an explanation.
  • A theory describes absolutes. Theories are the real thing. A theory describes the object of its focus. A theory does not simplify. Theories are irreducible, the foundation on which new metaphors can be built. A successful theory can become a fact. A theory describes the world and tries to describe the principles by which the world operates. A theory can be right or wrong, but it is characteristic by its intent: the discovery of essence.
Personally, I prefer to use the term "theory" rather than "model".  For all practical purposes, as I am using the terms; a model and a theory are effectively the same thing.  An ontology is an important part of a model or theory.  An ontology alone cannot represent either a model or a theory completely. It is also true that a theory or model cannot be described completely without the use of an ontology or something like an ontology.

A model/theory is a symbolic description of something that exists in "real space" so that it can be used in "cyberspace" (see Digital Proficiency).

Additional Information:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Big Idea for 2025: Semantic Accounting and Audit Working Papers

Image
I began my career in accounting in 1982 as an auditor with Price Waterhouse when accounting and audit working papers and schedules were 100% paper.  But within three months, I was creating many of those same working papers and schedules first in VisiCalc and then Lotus 1-2-3.  I would create those schedules and working papers electronically, then print them out, and tape them into the bundle of paper that supported our audits. The Compaq luggable computer was invented and electronic spreadsheets where even more compelling. Today, accounting and audit working papers tend to be 100% electronic proxies for those paper documents created in Excel or some other electronic spreadsheet, Word or some other word processing document, PDF generated from some word processing document, and maybe HTML.  All of these are presentation oriented proxies for documents and none of them is truly understandable by a computer based process. The next step in the evolution of accounting and audi...
Read more

Microsoft CEO: "AI Agents will Replace All Software"

Image
We have entered the "agentic era"; the era of the agent or intelligent software agent . Others refer to this as the "algorithmic economy".  Maybe think many very intelligent  microservices  exchanging information with each other and can work globally. In an interview with BG2, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella predicts that (paraphrasing) SaaS (software as a service) is dead and that AI agents will replace all software. The entire interview is the first link in "Additional Information" below.  These three videos provide a focused look at this statement: LinkedIn post including short video AI Insights Explorer video  (Microsoft CEO Predicts: "AI Agents Will Replace ALL Software") Microsoft CEO's Shocking Prediction: "Agents will replace ALL software" Here is my personal interpretation of what Satya Nadella is saying and what it means.  First, Nadella says that we are "on the brink of a monumental shift".  I agree with that statem...
Read more

Professional Study Group for Digital Financial Reporting

Image
Digital financial reporting is a thing.  The IFRS Foundation explains digital financial reporting  in an article, Digital Financial Reporting - Facilitating digital comparability and analysis of financial reports . OFFICIAL VERSION : The IFRS Foundation publishes an XBRL taxonomy for IFRS for SMEs (2024).  You can find official information about that XBRL taxonomy here on this web page, IFRS for SMEs as Published by IFRS Foundation (2024) . (Also see this PDF, IFRS Taxonomy Illustrated .) Since that official XBRL taxonomy is effectively a "pick list" created from the perspective of standards setters (i.e. not very practical, easy to use, and intended for ease of use by reporting economic entities);  ENHANCED VERSION : I have created an enhanced version of that same XBRL taxonomy, see  IFRS for SMEs 2024) - ENHANCED (Work in Progress) . The enhancements make the IFRS for SMEs XBRL taxonomy more useful in many different ways.  The enhancements are driven...
Read more