First Time Capability in 7,000 Years of Accounting

For the first time ever in about 7,000 years of accounting, a financial statement can be exchanged between two parties and portions of the information within that statement can be effectively understood by a machine.  Today, both humans and to some extent machines can understand financial statements and work with that information.

As Denise Schmandt-Bessersat in her video on the origin of writing, between 5,000 and 10,000 years ago farmers in Mesopotamia, where agriculture was born, used physical object to count crops and animals . The distinction between types of crops or animals was made by using different types and shapes of objects pressed into clay.  It was around that time, in about 3200 BC, around 5,000 years ago, the first spreadsheet was invented. Below you see an example, a Cuneiform tablet with seal impressions: administrative account of barley distribution with cylinder seal impression of a male figure, hunting dogs, and boars:

These farmers replaced the pressing of objects into clay with the marking of clay by scribes using styles, writing using Cuneiform.  The clay tablets eventually gave way to papyrus which was lighter than the clay.  Papyrus gave way to other mediums like bamboo stalks in some cases, linen, parchment, and paper.  Accounting using this mechanism was our first communications technology.

That all changed in July 2002 when 27 Dutch Association of Water Boards provided the first ever public implementation of XBRL. (See here for more information.) Today, as of this writing, there are 216 regulators that have implemented XBRL based reporting systems. Millions of companies report using the global standard XBRL technical format.

What is different now is that machines, such as computers running software, can to a degree read and understand the meaning conveyed by an XBRL-based digital financial statement.

The era of digital financial reporting has begun. Financial reporting standards setters are beginning to leverage machine-readable semantics. Proficiency of accountants is not where it needs to be yet, but it will get there.

Consider the implementations of this for a moment. What does this mean for financial accounting, reporting, auditing, and analysis?  A general purpose financial statement is effectively an information product; maybe even a knowledge product that might even be convertible into a decision product or service.  Hype aside; This same idea developed by accountants for financial reporting have implications for general business reporting and information exchange.

Refer to these reports as XBRL-based reports, logical twins, digital twins, mirror worlds, holographic financial information system, or whatever.  This has profound implications for the institution of accountancy globally.

Additional Information:


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Getting Started with Auditchain Luca (now called Luca Suite)

Image
(Note that a newer, production version as opposed to only the development version , of Luca Suite is available) The Innovator's Dilemma points out that disruptive innovations often look like toys that are doing everything wrong. Auditchain Luca , which is part of the Auditchain Suite , is a unique approach to creating a knowledge graph .  To experience using Auditchain Luca, have a look at the Getting Started with Auditchain Luca instructions. Be sure to grab the Excel and JSON import files used for this getting started exercise.   This getting started exercise uses one of several different approaches to getting information into a tool for constructing and viewing professional quality knowledge graphs .  Additional getting started guides will be made available over time. Auditchain Luca might not make sense to you if you don't understand the paradigm shift that is occurring and if you have not shifted your mental map. For the next step in your journey, consider t...
Read more

Relational Knowledge Graph System (RKGS)

Image
Relational Knowledge Graph System (RKGS) is an interesting idea that combines the relational paradigm and the knowledge graph paradigm.  This documentation, Why RKGS , explains the idea. This gets even more interesting with the notion of "relational AI".  RelationalAI is described as follows by the company of the same name, Relational.ai : “RelationalAI is a cloud-based relational knowledge graph management system, with state of the art probabilistic processing and declarative reasoning at scale to make developing Data Applications a superpower for your business.” This notion of knowledge graphs represented in relational databases fits into my belief that knowledge graphs have two aspects: the expression SYNTAX and the logic of what is expressed or SEMANTICS. While the LOGIC of a knowledge graph is always the same regardless of technical syntax used to express that logic; there are many, many different technical syntaxes that can be used to represent a knowledge graph. There...
Read more

Professional System for Creating Financial Reports Leveraging Knowledge Graphs

Image
The document Professional System for Creating Financial Reports Leveraging Knowledge Graphs explains a new approach, a new paradigm, for creating financial reports.  The document provides a practical, nontechnical description of a professional system for creating provably high-quality financial reports where the report creator is using financial reporting schemes (such as US GAAP and IFRS) where report creator is permitted to modify the report model which leverages global standard knowledge graphs represented using XBRL. This new approach is useful, it is highly novel, and the details were highly complicated to pull together.  This is certainly not an incremental innovation.  It is definitely a disruptive innovation and it could very well be a foundational innovation. You can decide which for yourself. Foundational technologies have two dimensions that need to be considered: novelty and complexity. The more novel the technology is, the more effort needed to ensure users ...
Read more