Financial Statement Designed to be Analyzed

A general purpose financial statement has a formal structure that varies only slightly from industry to industry, country to country, and therefore from reporting economic entity to reporting economic entity. This regularity is by design. The trend is toward even more standardization.  Examples of that standardization include International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (US GAAP), and the Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL).

In fact, general purpose financial statements are so formal and predictable as to be literally mechanical.

Over the past 50 years, these general purpose financial statements have grown in size and complexity. And yet, the general mechanism to construct and analyzed has not changed that much for these important artifacts of the global capital markets.

The general purpose financial statement is a designed system; it has been created by humans for a purpose. The global capital markets use the general purpose financial statement as one of many inputs to value an economic entity. Arguably, general purpose financial statements help the global capital markets function better.

Arguably, a better functioning general purpose financial statement would help the global capital markets function even better.

General purpose financial statements were designed for systematic computational analysis. General purpose financial statements were designed to be analyzed. Financial statements are knowledge graphs.

General purpose financial statements are comprised of a set of disclosures. Each disclosure is likewise designed for systematic computational analysis. This systematic computational analysis is achieved by leveraging the disclosure design patterns of a disclosure.

The mechanics of this formal, predictable, mechanical nature of a general purpose financial statement can be described using various mechanisms.  In the past, that description tended to be paragraphs and sentences of a document.  But technologies available today, such as UML models, ontologies, and machine-readable theories expressed using PROLOG are far better suited for describing the mechanics of this very mechanical designed system.  Other tools such as logic programming can be used to effectively perform that systematic computational analysis.

Quantitative analysis is an obvious first step toward systematic computational analysis.  Qualitative analysis is another step.  Strategic analysis is another step.  Competitive analysis is another step.  Landscape analysis is another step.  What I am doing with the Seattle Method is only the beginning.

Models, frameworks, and standards are tools.  One needs to be sure they are using the right tools for a job.  The tools of "realspace" (think industrial economy) and the tools of "cyperspace" (think information economy) are different. It takes skills and experience to be able to pick the right tools for a job.

Accounting, the universal technology of accountability, is arguably one of the most important technologies invented in the history of human civilization and has been around about 7,000 years.  Accounting was invented before writing and before the invention of numbers.  The global multinational organization simply could not exist without double entry bookkeeping and accounting.

Additional Information:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Getting Started with Auditchain Luca (now called Luca Suite)

Image
(Note that a newer, production version as opposed to only the development version , of Luca Suite is available) The Innovator's Dilemma points out that disruptive innovations often look like toys that are doing everything wrong. Auditchain Luca , which is part of the Auditchain Suite , is a unique approach to creating a knowledge graph .  To experience using Auditchain Luca, have a look at the Getting Started with Auditchain Luca instructions. Be sure to grab the Excel and JSON import files used for this getting started exercise.   This getting started exercise uses one of several different approaches to getting information into a tool for constructing and viewing professional quality knowledge graphs .  Additional getting started guides will be made available over time. Auditchain Luca might not make sense to you if you don't understand the paradigm shift that is occurring and if you have not shifted your mental map. For the next step in your journey, consider t...
Read more

Relational Knowledge Graph System (RKGS)

Image
Relational Knowledge Graph System (RKGS) is an interesting idea that combines the relational paradigm and the knowledge graph paradigm.  This documentation, Why RKGS , explains the idea. This gets even more interesting with the notion of "relational AI".  RelationalAI is described as follows by the company of the same name, Relational.ai : “RelationalAI is a cloud-based relational knowledge graph management system, with state of the art probabilistic processing and declarative reasoning at scale to make developing Data Applications a superpower for your business.” This notion of knowledge graphs represented in relational databases fits into my belief that knowledge graphs have two aspects: the expression SYNTAX and the logic of what is expressed or SEMANTICS. While the LOGIC of a knowledge graph is always the same regardless of technical syntax used to express that logic; there are many, many different technical syntaxes that can be used to represent a knowledge graph. There...
Read more

Professional System for Creating Financial Reports Leveraging Knowledge Graphs

Image
The document Professional System for Creating Financial Reports Leveraging Knowledge Graphs explains a new approach, a new paradigm, for creating financial reports.  The document provides a practical, nontechnical description of a professional system for creating provably high-quality financial reports where the report creator is using financial reporting schemes (such as US GAAP and IFRS) where report creator is permitted to modify the report model which leverages global standard knowledge graphs represented using XBRL. This new approach is useful, it is highly novel, and the details were highly complicated to pull together.  This is certainly not an incremental innovation.  It is definitely a disruptive innovation and it could very well be a foundational innovation. You can decide which for yourself. Foundational technologies have two dimensions that need to be considered: novelty and complexity. The more novel the technology is, the more effort needed to ensure users ...
Read more