Enterprise Ontology-like Things

Ontology-like things (a.k.a. knowledge graph systems) are becoming increasingly important.  Ontology-like things are machine-readable maps that help you understand your data and turn that data into information to make use of that data.

It is critically important to get those ontology-like things right because they will drive work in the information age.  As this LinkedIn post points out "layering" is important when you construct your "enterprise ontology" and provides this graphic of what layers make up such an enterprise ontology:

There are other dynamics also.  Modularity when creating ontologies is important so that pieces can be reused effectively.  Access is also important; some ontologies will be publicly available while other ontologies will be private.

Remember; when you think of "ontology", recognize that there are many different approaches to representing "ontology-like things" in machine-readable form: (larger image)


Quality matters.  Currently, there is not really an agreed upon way of measuring the quality of an ontology-like thing.  But good, quality ontology-like things will work; bad ontology-like things will not get you where you want to go.

Ontology-like things need to be maintained and have other life-cycle considerations.

Today, there is a lot of knowledge represented in unstructured and semi-structured form that needs to be structured.  Also, while some knowledge that can be considered "structured" or "semi-structured"; that structure might be for the presentation of knowledge as contrast to the meaning of that knowledge which make using or reusing that knowledge challenging.

Some, but not all, knowledge will be transitioned from unstructured and semi-structured formats with a focus on the meaning of information as contrast to the presentation of information.


A key thing to understand is that eventually hybrid AI will prevail. As Alan Morrison points out in this article; different AI have different capabilities.  As knowledge "moves around" between unstructured, semi-structured and structured forms with a focus on presentation versus meaning; the right balance will emerge.

All this knowledge will be connected in some way into a "fabric" or "mesh" or "assembly" of knowledge.  Lean Six Sigma techniques and principles will be applied to keep quality where it needs to be.  Enterprises that leverage this fabric will potentially prevail over those that do not as new approaches to performing tasks and processes are created.  Imagine something like Engine B's "Copilot"  that sits on top of a financial reporting scheme that is connected to a properly created XBRL taxonomy. that works within an expert system for creating financial reports.  Many have talked about "algorithmic regulation" (see page 18) but few can actually do it.  Apply design patterns and logic patterns to build powerful yet safe software systems using not "silo thinking" but rather "systems thinking".

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Relational Knowledge Graph System (RKGS)

Image
Relational Knowledge Graph System (RKGS) is an interesting idea that combines the relational paradigm and the knowledge graph paradigm.  This documentation, Why RKGS , explains the idea. This gets even more interesting with the notion of "relational AI".  RelationalAI is described as follows by the company of the same name, Relational.ai : “RelationalAI is a cloud-based relational knowledge graph management system, with state of the art probabilistic processing and declarative reasoning at scale to make developing Data Applications a superpower for your business.” This notion of knowledge graphs represented in relational databases fits into my belief that knowledge graphs have two aspects: the expression SYNTAX and the logic of what is expressed or SEMANTICS. While the LOGIC of a knowledge graph is always the same regardless of technical syntax used to express that logic; there are many, many different technical syntaxes that can be used to represent a knowledge graph. There
Read more

Getting Started with Auditchain Luca

Image
The Innovator's Dilemma points out that disruptive innovations often look like toys that are doing everything wrong. Auditchain Luca , which is part of the Auditchain Suite , is a unique approach to creating a knowledge graph .  To experience using Auditchain Luca, have a look at the Getting Started with Auditchain Luca instructions. Be sure to grab the Excel and JSON import files used for this getting started exercise.   This getting started exercise uses one of several different approaches to getting information into a tool for constructing and viewing professional quality knowledge graphs .  Additional getting started guides will be made available over time. Auditchain Luca might not make sense to you if you don't understand the paradigm shift that is occurring and if you have not shifted your mental map. For the next step in your journey, consider trying creating a report using a financial reporting scheme template . If you are struggling to figure out how to register or
Read more

Evaluating the Quality of XBRL-based Financial Reports

Image
From the time public companies started submitting XBRL-based financial reports to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, I have been looking at those reports, trying to understand the XBRL-based reports, and trying to figure out how to get them right.  That information was used to figure out how to create software applications that help professional accountants get these reports right. Here is information that summarizes my testing and results which I stopped doing March 31, 2019: Analysis of the high level accounting relationships in the 10-Ks of about 5,716 financial reports  (5,063 public companies, about 89.1% got all these high level accounting relationships consistent with expectation, 623 were inconsistent and manual confirmation revealed the inconsistency was an error) Documentation that helps you understand 26 different types of errors in XBRL-based reports High quality documentation of hundreds of errors in XBRL-based reports submitted by public companies to the SEC Doc
Read more